Tehami Dermatology

    Neurofibromatosis type 1

    Clinical criteria, age-dependent findings and surveillance in NF1.

    Updated: 2026-09-13

    Written for clinicians and medical students

    This section is a teaching reference for doctors, residents and medical students. It is not patient guidance and not a substitute for clinical examination, and it must not be used for self treatment.

    Recognition and diagnosis

    • NF1 is autosomal dominant and highly variable. Diagnosis uses revised criteria combining café-au-lait macules, axillary or inguinal freckling, neurofibromas, optic pathway glioma, Lisch nodules or choroidal abnormalities, osseous lesions, a pathogenic NF1 variant and an affected parent [1,2].
    • Six or more café-au-lait macules support the diagnosis only when size thresholds and other criteria are considered. Findings accumulate with age, so a young child may need longitudinal review [1].
    • Segmental pigment or neurofibromas may represent mosaic NF1. Bilateral pigmentary findings alone also require consideration of Legius syndrome [1].

    Surveillance and red flags

    • Children need annual clinical review including skin, blood pressure, growth, skeletal assessment, development and vision according to age; routine screening MRI is not recommended in an asymptomatic child [1].
    • Persistent pain, rapid enlargement, hardening or neurologic deficit in a plexiform neurofibroma raises concern for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour and requires urgent specialist assessment [1].
    • Offer genetic counselling. Affected individuals have a 50 percent chance of transmitting the variant, but severity cannot be predicted reliably within a family [2].

    Sources

    1. [1] GeneReviews. Neurofibromatosis 1. Updated 2025.
    2. [2] Legius E et al. Revised diagnostic criteria for NF1 and Legius syndrome. Genetics in Medicine. 2021.

    By continuing to use this website, you accept our collection of the information necessary to provide our services. See our Privacy Policy.